Parking BOXX (purchase)$88,200
You own the equipment
Hand an operator a share of gross revenue — or run the lot yourself with equipment that handles the work. Barrier gates, pay stations, LPR cameras, and CloudEASE software, direct from a North American manufacturer.
Manufacturer-direct
Published pricing, no reseller markup
85+ years combined parking experience
North American support — one call, one company
Gross parking revenue $730,000 / yr Transactions 400 / day
8-year total cost your numbers, below
Parking BOXX (purchase)$88,200
You own the equipment
Management Company (25% Revenue Share) $1,460,000
$1,371,800 lost revenue
Software Fee Model ($1.00/Transaction) $1,168,000
$1,079,800 lost revenue
| Options | 3 year | 5 year | 8 year | Lost revenue (8 yr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parking BOXX (purchase) | $61,200 | $72,000 | $88,200 | $0 |
| Management Co. (25% Rev Share) | $547,500 | $912,500 | $1,460,000 | −$1,371,800 |
| Software Fee ($1.00/txn) | $438,000 | $730,000 | $1,168,000 | −$1,079,800 |
Parking BOXX — Based on a base system: one entry lane, one exit lane, and CloudEASE cloud software. Installation is included. You own the hardware. Excludes optional warranty upgrades and service contracts. Additional lanes increase equipment cost; software stays priced per device rather than per transaction.
Management Company — A share of gross parking revenue. Agreements commonly run from 15% to 40% or more depending on market, facility type, and scope of service, with the higher end typically where the operator supplies on-site attendants, valet, and customer service.
Transactional Fee — A fee on every transaction. Per-transaction pricing varies by provider and may exclude validations, monthly parker credentials, equipment, and installation, which are often billed separately.
Figures are illustrative and follow the numbers you enter above. Costs are cumulative and not discounted for inflation or the time value of money.
The costs are above. This is the structural difference — what each model does, who staffs it, and who ends up owning the equipment, the data, and the customer relationship.
| How the models differ | Parking management company | Parking BOXX — automated management |
|---|---|---|
| What you pay | 15% to 40% of gross revenue — lower for tech-only arrangements, higher with attendants and valet | One-time equipment purchase plus a CloudEASE license per device |
| How long you pay it | Every year the agreement runs | You own the equipment outright |
| Cut per transaction | Varies by agreement | 0% revenue share |
| Cost as the lot gets busier | Rises with revenue | Flat — priced per device, not per car |
| Who staffs the lot | Operator's attendants and cashiers | Automated — LPR, unattended pay stations, remote diagnostics |
| Reservation demand | Operator's network | ParkWhiz, SpotHero, and hotel PMS integrations |
| Who owns the data | Operator | You |
Revenue-share ranges describe how operator agreements are commonly structured across the industry and vary by market, facility type, and scope of service. Use the share you have actually been quoted when comparing.
An operator is the better choice when the facility needs valet, when event throughput requires surge staffing, or when the owner wants no day-to-day involvement whatsoever. Operators also bring established demand networks in dense downtown markets, which matters for a lot that cannot fill itself.
Automated management assumes something different: that you want control of the asset and the revenue it produces. If genuinely hands-off ownership is the goal, an operator agreement is the honest answer — and no amount of equipment changes that.
Correct — and it is the objection worth resolving before any cost comparison matters. Demand comes from being findable and bookable, not from hardware.
CloudEASE integrates with ParkWhiz and SpotHero, the same reservation platforms operators list inventory on, so the lot stays bookable online after a switch. Hotel property management system integration validates guest parking against room reservations and can post charges back to the folio. Pay-by-plate covers drive-up traffic without a ticket. The demand channels stay open; the revenue simply stops being shared.
Written for the questions owners and asset managers actually ask when comparing an operator agreement against owning the equipment.
Send us your facility size, rate structure, and the revenue share you have been quoted. We will send back a system configuration with pricing and a projection, so the comparison is based on your numbers rather than an industry average.
Response within 1 business day.